Why plasma?


Comparison of plasma, oxyfuel and laser

Thick

Laser

Laser provides excellent cut quality and productivity on material less than 6 mm. Laser technology has high capital equipment, running and maintenance costs, therefore a high level of business volume is required to pay back the cost of the equipment.

Plasma

Plasma provides an optimal mix of cut quality, productivity and operating cost for mild steel, stainless and aluminum across a wide range of thicknesses at a competitive capital equipment price.
38 mm
(1 1/2")







Material
thickness

 




6 mm
1/4"

 


Thin

 
Low volume
 

Business volume

 
High volume


Plasma provides the optimal mix of cut quality, productivity and operating cost

Plasma advantages
vs. oxyfuel

Better cut quality

Greater material flexibilty Significantly higher productivity Signifcantly lower cost per length of cut


Plasma advantages
vs. laser

Significantly higher productivity

Increases flexibility to cut a wide range of material thicknesses and types

Significantly lower capital, operating and maintenance costs

      Oxyfuel     Plasma     Laser

Oxyfuel

Oxyfuel is limited to mild steel and is not effective on
stainless steel or aluminum.
Cut quality
Good angularity Large heat-affected zone Dross levels require rework Not effective on stainless steel or aluminum

Excellent angularity

Small heat-affected zone

Virtually dross-free

Good to excellent fine-feature cutting.

Excellent angularity

Small heat-affected zone

Virtually dross-free

Good to excellent fine-feature cutting with narrowest kerf

Productivity

Slow cutting speeds

Pre-heat time increases pierce times

Very fast cutting speeds for all thicknesses

Very fast pierce times

Quick-disconnect torches maximize productivity

Very fast on thin material (less than 6 mm-1/4") and slower on thicker material

Long pierce times on thick material

Operating cost

Poor productivity and required rework drive cost per part higher than plasma.

Long consumable life, good productivity and excellent cut quality drive the cost per part lower than other technologies.

High costs per part due to power requirements, gas consumption, high maintenance costs and relatively low cut speeds on thick material.

Maintenance

Simple maintenance requirements can often be performed by in-house maintenance groups.

Moderate maintenance requirements: many components are servicable by in-house maintenance groups.

Complex maintenance tasks require specialized technicians.